Input pins with same naming

multiple inlets with the same naming could be acceptable within a subpatch,
it would also solve the jumping link issue in the parent patch.

multiple pins one (3.5 kB)

just realised this feature would imply v4 giving out unique names when auto-naming inlets.
example: if an inlet ‘y input value’ exists, the next one to be created via middle click would be ‘y input value 2’
this way, data from parent patch will not stream into the subpatch at unwanted places.